lxml now a setuptools "extra"

[Malthe Borch]

To the best of my knowledge extras are generally named after an optional
feature, not an implementation details. May I suggest to rename that extra
'genshi' instead of 'lxml'? From what I understand lxml is only necessary if
you want genshi support.

Since by now, the ElementTree-implementation is quite strong, I think
it makes sense to have lxml be optional. We plan to integrate an
XPath-parser (maybe PDIS-XPath) that works directly on an
ElementTree-structure.

If this works out, I think it makes sense to name the option "lxml".

\malthe

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "z3c.pt" group.
To post to this group, send email to ***@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to z3c_pt+***@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/z3c_pt?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---